Table of Contents Table of Contents
Previous Page  96 / 111 Next Page
Information
Show Menu
Previous Page 96 / 111 Next Page
Page Background

Monthly Endnotes

88

OPEC Monthly Oil Market Report – August 2017

California extends cap-and-trade programme to 2030

The US state of California voted in July to extend its cap-and-trade programme until 2030. The programme

was previously only authorized to run until 2020. The measure passed by a two-thirds majority in both the

state’s Assembly and Senate, ensuring that it will avoid potential legal challenges from businesses claiming

that it is an illegal tax.

Prior to the passage of the bill, the state had a goal of reducing Greenhouse Gas (GHG) Emissions to 1990

levels by the year 2020 and an 80% reduction by 2050. The new bill – titled AB 398 – establishes a medium-

term target for 2030 of 40% below 1990 levels. According to the state’s Air Resources Board, the cap-and-

trade programme will contribute at least 25% of the emission cuts needed by 2030.

The programme, established in 2012, aims to encourage emission reductions at the lowest possible cost by

placing a statewide, annual cap on emissions, allocating emissions permits to the target entities, and then

creating a market for these permits through an auction process. Under the programme, the emissions cap

declines each year – by 2% in the initial years of the programme and by 3% since 2015 – creating a financial

incentive for businesses to determine themselves how to achieve GHG reductions.

The cap and trade rules first applied in 2011 to electric power plants and industrial plants emitting 25,000

metric tons of carbon dioxide equivalent per year or more. In 2015, this was expanded to fuel distributors

emitting above the same threshold.

Additionally, the bill cuts the use of out-of-state carbon offsets, as well as decreases free carbon allowances

over 40% by 2030. It also designates the California Air Resources Board (ARB) as the regulatory body

responsible for ensuring the state meets its GHG reduction targets, pre-empting local regulatory control.

At the same time, the bill provides tax cuts for rural homeowners and some California manufacturers and

free allowances for trade-exposed industries. Additionally, the bill requires the Californian regulator to set a

ceiling price for allowances to avoid any disruptive spikes in prices.

The legislature also passed a companion bill (AB 617) aimed at creating a uniform state-wide system of

monitoring and annual reporting of air pollutants and toxic air contaminants from stationary sources, such as

factories and refineries. The bill also places them under the authority of the state’s Air Resource Board,

which is already responsible for regulating mobile-source air pollution, including specification of vehicular fuel

composition and the adoption of rules for reducing vehicle emissions.

Efforts at the state-level come at a time when the US government under the Trump Administration has

changed its approach to climate issues. On 4 August, the Trump administration submitted formal notice of its

intent to withdraw from the Paris Climate Agreement “as soon as it is eligible to do so”, according to a

statement released by the US State Department. The statement goes on to say that the US will “continue to

participate in international climate change negotiations and meetings, including the 23

rd

Conference of the

Parties (COP-23) of the UN Framework Convention on Climate Change, to protect US interests and ensure

all future policy options remain open to the administration.” The earliest that the US could completely

withdraw from the agreement is 4 November 2019.